"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
01/10/2014 at 02:35 • Filed to: None | 1 | 7 |
Mattbob
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
01/10/2014 at 07:34 | 0 |
NSFW
6cyl
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
01/10/2014 at 09:36 | 0 |
The last photo made me think of this song
King Ginger, not writing for Business Insider
> 6cyl
01/10/2014 at 10:06 | 0 |
I love GBS, so good.
Once_upon_a_pvt
> Mattbob
01/10/2014 at 12:22 | 0 |
Is literally any picture of a woman NSFW? I mean shit I work for the army and the gooberment allows the chive without any issues. I mean if it's really a rule that any woman with more than an ankle showing is NSFW I guess that works, it's just weird.
Once_upon_a_pvt
> Mattbob
01/10/2014 at 12:22 | 0 |
Is literally any picture of a woman NSFW? I mean shit I work for the army and the gooberment allows the chive without any issues. I mean if it's really a rule that any woman with more than an ankle showing is NSFW I guess that works, it's just weird.
Mattbob
> Once_upon_a_pvt
01/10/2014 at 12:25 | 1 |
there is nipples in one of the pictures. Just because your work environment is such that it is okay to look at sexy women on a work computer is okay, doesn't mean everyone's is. It is a courtesy to just put NSFW in front of the post. It isn't a big imposition. Just respect that some people are in different circumstances than you.
Once_upon_a_pvt
> Mattbob
01/10/2014 at 12:59 | 0 |
Yea I mean nipples makes sense, but ppl are literally labeling anything with a woman NSFW. it's a bit much sometimes how sensitive ppl are these days.
I'm gonna start tagging NSFW for pictures of fully clothed men just for the equality of it.